Reference only

Required input is missing: identify the exact node and field

The backend found a missing required input before execution. Use the reported node and field to repair that specific gap before investigating further failures.

Symptoms and scope

The backend found a missing required input before execution. Use the reported node and field to repair that specific gap before investigating further failures.

Error fragments for search; IDs, values and filenames may vary:

Required input is missing
required_input_missing

Source-supported context

Core validate_inputs checks the presence of inputs declared required by the current node. The /prompt response's node_errors is more precise than a generic execution-failed banner. Source 1 Source 2

Cases to distinguish

1. A required socket is disconnected or a widget value was not exported.

2. An API client omitted a field, used the wrong inputs nesting or removed a meaningful value.

3. A node update added a required input that an older workflow has not supplied.

Diagnostic sequence

The sequence below is an editorial procedure based on the cited context, not a diagnosis already confirmed for your environment.

Step 1. Expand the error details and record the node ID, technical class and input_name.

Step 2. Inspect the current node UI or server /object_info to distinguish required and optional definitions.

Step 3. Connect an upstream output of the correct type or provide the defined literal value. Adding a same-named null is not necessarily valid.

Step 4. Re-export and inspect the actual request inputs before resubmitting. Document the template migration when an update introduced the field.

Completion check

The missing-input error disappears and the related upstream nodes also validate. Other genuine errors may become visible afterwards.

Limitations and cautions

Identical input names on different nodes can have different meanings. Do not insert arbitrary images, models or fictional paths just to satisfy presence checks.

Original sources

Localization prepared: 2026-09-22. The source-check dates above were inherited from the existing article; this translation does not claim they were all rechecked today. No GPU run, minimum-memory measurement or runtime guarantee is supplied.

Didn't solve it?

Check the next possible cause

The same symptom can come from a different cause. Work through these related entries in order.

  1. Return type mismatch: inspect the source output slot and destination inputReturn type mismatch between linked nodesIMAGE, LATENT, MODEL and CONDITIONING have different roles. A drawable connection or similar socket color is not sufficient evidence of a valid interface.
  2. POST /prompt returns 400: inspect error and node_errors before retryingprompt_outputs_failed_validationA rejected request needs structured error inspection. HTTP 400 is not, by itself, evidence of an unstable network and should not trigger endless resubmission.
Paste your full log into the error finder

Was this page helpful?

Anonymous. Only a yes/no counter is stored; no account, IP address or device details.

Sources & references

Localized from the existing Chinese research draft. Original source-check dates are retained; this translation is not new technical verification or a runtime test.

01ComfyUI execution.py validationSource checked: 2026-09-2102ComfyUI Server API routesSource checked: 2026-09-21

Report an issue · 2131ac07-b652-5bc8-a11f-3ad66ae5e91b